Skip to main content

John Locke Essay Competition · 2026 questions

John Locke Politics Essay Questions

Politics essays fail in a predictable way: the student picks a side of a current argument and writes an opinion column. The judges are political theorists and historians, and they reward a definition, a mechanism and evidence from more than one country.

The 2026 questions below are the official set. The 2027 questions are expected in late January 2027 and this page will carry them within 48 hours.

Updated Sep 27, 20262027 questions: expected late January 2027

The 2026 Politics questions, one by one

Quoted verbatim from the John Locke Institute. For each: what the examiners are testing, where strong students lose marks, the argument lines that hold up over 2,000 words, and what to read before you write.

What it is really asking

Who the "self" is, and what happens when two selves claim the same territory. The word "absolute" invites you to find the limit.

The trap

Arguing about one case (Catalonia, Kosovo, Taiwan) as if it settles the principle. Use cases to test a rule, not to replace one.

Lines of argument that can carry 2,000 words

  • The nested-minorities problem: every secession creates a new minority with the same claim. A right that generates its own violation cannot be absolute.
  • Remedial-right theory (Buchanan): self-determination is a remedy for injustice, not a primary right. This explains why Kosovo and Catalonia are treated differently.
  • The territorial-integrity norm exists to prevent wars; ask whether the price of an absolute right is paid by the people it claims to free.

Read first

  • Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination, Allen Buchanan
  • Nations and Nationalism, Ernest Gellner
  • UN General Assembly Resolution 1514 (1960) and the ICCPR, Article 1, primary sources

What the judges reward in Politics

The official criteria are knowledge and understanding, competent use of evidence, quality of argumentation, originality, structure, writing style and persuasive force. In this category that means:

  • 1A definition of the contested term in paragraph one, then fidelity to it.
  • 2Evidence from at least two countries, including one that cuts against your thesis.
  • 3Political theory used to explain a mechanism rather than to name-drop.
  • 4A conclusion that states what would change your mind.

No published winning essay yet

Politics was introduced in 2026, so the Institute has not yet published a winning essay in this category. The closest models are the published Economics, Politics-adjacent and Philosophy winners, which we take apart paragraph by paragraph in our guide to the published essays.

Past winning essays, analysed

How to prepare for the 2027 Politics questions before they are released

  1. 1

    Pick the question where you can name a mechanism, not just a view.

  2. 2

    Build a two-column case file: evidence for, evidence against. If the second column is empty, you have not read enough.

  3. 3

    Read one theorist in the original and one data report; cite both.

  4. 4

    Avoid the current-affairs voice. Write as if the reader has not seen the news this year.

John Locke Essay Competition prep for Politics

John Locke Basics

12 group sessions plus 6 hours of 1-on-1 mentorship, from question choice to a submission-ready draft. 38 of our 41 students were shortlisted in 2026.

Questions about the Politics category

It is neither easier nor harder; it is judged differently. Politics rewards a clear definition, a mechanism and comparative evidence from more than one country, while Philosophy rewards a single argument defended against its best objection. Students with a strong history or economics background often do better in Politics because the evidence base is concrete.